[linux-elitists] What's wrong with PDF
Sun Nov 9 20:23:28 PST 2003
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:11:59PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> On 09-Nov-2003, Jason Spence wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:13:07PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> > > I'm _almost_ curious enough to deal with PDF hassles, but not
> > > quite.
> > What's your beef with PDF?
> PDF is great for converting to paper, if that's a goal. For anything
> involving *reading the actual file*, it sucks charcoal.
> For something that is essentially a text document, distributing it as a
> PDF is a pointless barrier to usability. A very poor choice for a
> standards document.
> Jakob Nielsen, while he may say some bizarre things at times, is on the
> money with regard to PDF usability:
> He's talking about it in the context of web sites, but the points are
> valid in this context also.
Hmm, those are some good points - I never really thought about PDF
files too much. Looking back on it I suppose I just put up with the
problems because I had to read the PDFs to accomplish some task, kind
of like the DMV.
A few things I've noticed about workflow when PDF is involved:
- Some people think the content creatopm tools are better for PDF as
opposed to HTML. I hear a lot of complaints about inconsistent
CSS2 support and how table-based positioning is getting worse and
- There's a whole group of people like lawyers and other
professionals who link a piece of paper with some mental construct
it's supposed to represent. This is the same group that tends to
deposit their paycheck at the bank teller window or will avoid
buying stuff over the Internet because the concepts involved are a
little too abstract and/or scary for them.
I've noticed that this group tends like PDFs more than people who
aren't like that, which may explain the heavy use of it in
- Jason Last known location: 11.0 miles northeast of MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
A closed mouth gathers no foot.
More information about the linux-elitists