[linux-elitists] Top-posting

Ben Finney bignose@zip.com.au
Fri May 16 16:25:05 PDT 2003


On 15 May 2003, Ben Woodard wrote:
> Don,
> 
> How can they prove legally [...]
> 
> -ben
> 
> On Wed, 2003-05-14 at 19:35, Don Marti wrote:
> > Played a little guessing game [...]

Dammit, I don't see any prohibition against top-posting on the list info
page:

  <http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists>

Why not?  This is supposed to be an *elitists* list, and we all know
top-posting is wrong, wrong, wrong.

-- 
 \       A: No.                                                        |
  `\     Q: Should I write my reply above the quoted text?             |
_o__)                                                                  |
bignose@zip.com.au  F'print 9CFE12B0 791A4267 887F520C B7AC2E51 BD41714B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030517/5bce5fbe/attachment.pgp 


More information about the linux-elitists mailing list