[linux-elitists] The breadth of SCO's claims
Karsten M. Self
Tue Jun 24 08:25:11 PDT 2003
on Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:27:32AM +0530, Raghavendra Bhat (email@example.com) wrote:
> mbp@samba posts:
> >> It is widely believed that Windows contains some BSD code for
> >> networking and other reasons.
> As the BSD license is a weak one, it is a moot point as to where its
> code-base would be landing in. The community has been deprived of its
> own efforts, in all these instances of the seepage/pilferage of the
> BSD code-base by unethical entities.
Note that this isn't how the BSD community sees things. At least not
those who are license-aware.
The stated goal of several projects (OpenBSD comes to mind) is to use
licensing terms which don't restrict use within proprietary products, if
that is the intent of the user.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
The truth behind the H-1B IT indentured servant scam:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030624/d09e5399/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists