[linux-elitists] SCO drops its bomb
Karsten M. Self
Mon Jun 16 21:36:24 PDT 2003
on Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:38:35PM -0700, Rick Moen (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> Quoting Mikael Pawlo (email@example.com):
> > It is hardly that easy in any Western jurisdiction.
> ...and moreover happens only if the court grants the requested
> injunction, following plaintiff convincing the court that (1) there's a
> serious cause of action, and that (2) damages alone wouldn't suffice,
> absent defendant (or some third party) also being enjoined from
> continuing whatever he's doing.
> It's my understanding that courts apply a very high burden of proof to
> such motions, often holding an evidentiary hearing on the question, yes?
And, if I'm getting one half or the other of the injunction side right,
posting a bond.
Say, 10% of $1b. I don't think SCO can come up with $100m in securities
on short notice. Though I could be wrong on the valuation.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
VAR with attitude -- Automation Access: http://www.aaxnet.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030617/38c15c19/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists