Sig Delimiters (was: Re: [linux-elitists] Boies Faces Ethics Charges)

Patrik Wallstrom pawal@blipp.com
Tue Jul 29 02:07:24 PDT 2003


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Karsten M. Self wrote:

> on Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:54:38PM -0400, Gerald Oskoboiny (gerald@impressive.net) wrote:
>
> > The state of email standards seems fairly broken to me in general.
> > Whenever I want to flame someone because their autoresponder is
> > broken or something, I find it difficult to find references to
> > back me up. Anyone have good refs handy for that kind of thing?
> 
> True elitists never let the lack of standards get in the way of
> dismissing or ridiculing practices which are baldly misguided.

However, IETF just issued the following draft:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-moore-auto-email-response-01.txt

"Recommendations for Automatic Responses to Electronic Mail"

[...]

Please comment on it and make sure it becomes an RFC.

And there is also the old Netiquette RFC, number 1855, "Netiquette
Guidelines".

- -- 
patrik_wallstrom->foodfight->pawal@blipp.com->+46-733173956
                `-> http://www.gnuheter.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/JjlMXP9l7Jnf3xURAtXeAJ4lcndHWdWSQfkP5kgq+r2tjK8bfwCffR63
+V5kUix47VrPSfa2GGcIwW8=
=DQyW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the linux-elitists mailing list