[linux-elitists] [DMCA_Discuss] Some Xbox Fans Microsoft Didn't Aim For (fwd)

Jay Sulzberger jays@panix.com
Thu Jul 10 02:16:09 PDT 2003


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 12:48:57 +0400
 From: Vladimir Katalov <vkatalov@elcomsoft.com>
 To: dmca_discuss@lists.microshaft.org
 Subject: [DMCA_Discuss] Some Xbox Fans Microsoft Didn't Aim For


 Some Xbox Fans Microsoft Didn't Aim For
 By SETH SCHIESEL
 NYTimes (10/07/2003)

 http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/10/technology/circuits/10xbox.html

 AFTER a 31-year-old Manhattan financial executive received Microsoft's
 Xbox video game system as a gift in January, he walked to a store and
 bought a half-dozen game titles. The video game industry would have
 been pleased to hear it.

 After he played those games a few times against computer-controlled
 opponents, he got a bit bored and signed up for Microsoft's Xbox Live
 service, which enabled him to play against other people online. The
 video game industry, again, would have been pleased.

 After a few months on the Xbox Live network, in May, he got a bit
 bored again. This time, however, he opened his Xbox and soldered in a
 chip that allowed him to change the console's basic computer code and
 bypass its internal security technology. After installing a new hard
 drive, he transferred about 3,000 MP3 music files to the system and
 downloaded illegal copies of 3,500 old-time arcade games. Then he
 installed the Linux operating system, which allowed him to use the box
 essentially as a personal computer.

 Needless to say, the video game industry would not have been pleased.

 When Microsoft released the Xbox in November 2001, it was heralded as
 far more than a game machine. Even as the Xbox took aim at Sony's
 PlayStation 2 game empire, the console was meant to lead Microsoft's
 broader invasion of the living room. Incorporating a hard drive, which
 made it more readily adaptable than other consoles, the Xbox had the
 potential to be a digital-entertainment nerve center.

 Bill Gates, Microsoft's chairman, said at the time, "We're going to
 put new software that runs on Xbox that, both in the gaming dimension
 and other dimensions, will amaze people with the power that's in this
 box."

 That is happening, but not necessarily as Microsoft planned. All sorts
 of new software is indeed running on Xbox consoles these days, and
 they are in fact becoming home-entertainment hubs, but it is not
 Microsoft doing the amazing.

 Rather, an online confederacy apparently numbering in the thousands -
 including accomplished hackers of varied motives and everyday
 technophiles like the Manhattan financial executive (who shared his
 experience on the condition of anonymity) - is taking the lead. Those
 involved often call their efforts "unleashing" or "unshackling" -
 freeing the Xbox to express its inner PC. Technology industry
 executives, however, often call such activity a bald attempt to hijack
 the Xbox illegally.

 It is a battle that involves many of the ethical and legal issues
 facing the technology and media industries at this digital moment.
 What rights do consumers have to tinker with products they own? How
 far should companies go to protect their intellectual property? What
 happens when the desires of consumers conflict with the business
 models of companies they patronize? Who gets to decide just what a
 particular product may be used for?

 The Xbox is a particularly attractive target for hackers because while
 it is essentially a standard PC modified to do only a few things, like
 play Xbox games, it is much cheaper than a PC. It is like an economy
 car modified to follow only a few roads - but one potentially as
 powerful as a far more expensive model.

 In the Xbox, that power comes in the form of a 733-megahertz Intel
 processor, comparable to a midrange personal computer, and
 sophisticated graphics and audio systems. Its limited operating
 system, based on a version of Windows, can be used by a programmer to
 run simple software like a music player - or the machine can run a new
 operating system altogether, namely Linux. "The reality is that if you
 could bypass Microsoft's operating system you would end up with a
 fairly powerful computer for less than $200," the Manhattan financial
 executive said.

 In fact, Microsoft lowered the price for Xbox to $179.99 in May. In a
 sense, Xbox hackers are exploiting Microsoft's business model, which
 is to sell Xbox hardware at a loss (to build penetration of the
 system) and make the money back on royalties from the sale of Xbox
 software. A PC manufacturer like Dell, meanwhile, has to recoup its
 costs and generate a profit from the initial sale.

 So someone who buys the Xbox hardware, modifies it into a
 general-purpose computer and does not buy Xbox games potentially
 undermines not only Microsoft but also the personal computer industry.
 But that is not how some Xbox hackers think about it.

 "Especially in Europe, computers are more expensive than they are
 here, and the Xbox is the cheapest computer you can get," Andrew
 Huang, author of a new book called "Hacking the Xbox: An Introduction
 to Reverse Engineering," said in a telephone interview. "Basically,"
 he added by e-mail, "once you have Linux, you have everything."

 It is unclear just how many Xbox hackers there are. Officials of the
 Interactive Digital Software Association, a trade group of video game
 publishers, said that Xbox hacking appeared more prevalent in parts of
 Asia than in North America. Michael Steil, a 24-year-old German who is
 project leader of a group that calls itself the Xbox Linux Project,
 said by e-mail that a full version of Linux software for the Xbox had
 been downloaded more than 220,000 times.

 Whatever the numbers, Microsoft does not appear eager to discuss Xbox
 hacking. In recent weeks, a Microsoft public relations representative
 repeatedly declined to make any company executives available to
 discuss the matter. Instead, the company issued a statement through a
 public relations firm that said in part: "Microsoft is a company
 passionate about innovation and creativity. We are also very committed
 to respect for others' intellectual property and we request the same
 respect applied to our innovations."

 The statement made no reference to the potential use of hacked Xbox
 consoles as personal computers, saying Microsoft's "primary concern"
 was with the sale of modified chips for the boxes "that enable game
 counterfeiting." And that is the area that most clearly raises legal
 issues.

 Although there are several methods, hacking an Xbox typically involves
 obtaining a special chip called a modchip, available on the Internet,
 and soldering it into the machine. (For those who find the process
 daunting, there are also vendors on the Internet who sell "pre-modded"
 Xbox units.)

 Modchips, of which there are several varieties, allow users to load
 new versions of the basic computer code, known as the BIOS, that tells
 the machine how to operate. A hacked BIOS generally incorporates
 modified versions of copyrighted Microsoft code and so is generally
 illegal. The main Web sites that deal with Xbox hacking do not include
 links to hacked BIOS, and hackers generally find their forbidden fruit
 in Internet chat rooms.

 Once the modchip is installed and the BIOS modified, the console can
 do a number of things it cannot do "out of the box." Xbox games
 normally must be run from an optical disk, and a hacked Xbox can "back
 up" a game to the unit's hard drive and run the game without the disk.
 This technique could be used simply to avoid having to insert and
 remove disks - or it could be used for piracy (say, by renting a game,
 putting the software on the hard drive and returning the game).

 Until passage of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in 1998, the
 mere sale of a modified chip would not have appeared illegal. That
 law, however, prohibits the sale of devices that are primarily meant
 to circumvent copyright protection.

 Companies and technologists will fight over the exact legal meaning of
 those provisions for years. For now, however, the software industry is
 relying on them.

 "Our view over all on modchips is that they are illegal infringing
 devices, that where we find people engaged in the widespread
 manufacturing and distribution of them, we and our members,
 individually and collectively, are committed to doing what we can to
 shut down their manufacturing and go after the distributors," said
 Doug Lowenstein, president of the Interactive Digital Software
 Association.

 Some advocates, however, say that while software piracy is illegal and
 morally offensive, the mere act of modifying hardware should not be
 illegal. "The most important dimension of this debate from our view is
 that people should have the right to tinker with the stuff that they
 own," said Fred von Lohmann, senior staff attorney at the Electronic
 Frontier Foundation, a civil-liberties group in San Francisco.

 "Others will say that this is about piracy and all that, but they
 forget that the principle of tinkering with the stuff that you own was
 the principle on which the entire personal computer industry was
 founded," he added. "This is basic business and basic science in the
 technology world and we think that this right to tinker, this freedom
 to tinker, remains legally protected.''

 For now, however, the federal government seems to agree with Mr.
 Lowenstein. Last December, David M. Rocci, a 22-year-old from
 Blacksburg, Va., pleaded guilty to a federal charge of conspiring to
 import, market and sell modchips for the Xbox. In April, he was
 sentenced to five months in prison and five months of home detention.

 Simply from the standpoint of accessibility, the PlayStation 2 would
 seem to be a more likely candidate for hacking. IDG, the technology
 research firm, estimates that at the end of last year, 38.1 million
 PlayStation 2 units were in use in Europe, North America and Japan
 combined, compared with 6.7 million Xbox units in those regions.

 In one sense, however, the hacking scene for PlayStation 2 is less
 developed than the one for Xbox because there is less appetite for it.
 Sony sells an official conversion kit for the PlayStation 2 that
 includes a hard drive and allows that system to run the Linux
 operating system, which in turn allows the system to run MP3's,
 movies, spreadsheets or any other program or data that works under
 Linux. It is relatively easy for Sony to embrace Linux because Sony,
 unlike Microsoft, is not in the operating system business.

 The PlayStation 2 hacking community seems focused on developing chips
 that allow PlayStation 2 units to run illegal copies of games and
 games meant for far-flung parts of the world. (For marketing reasons,
 many PlayStation 2 games include regional coding, much as DVD's do.)
 In 2001, Sony sued an Australian for selling modchips that allowed
 Australian PlayStation 2 units to play games from other parts of the
 world. After the Australian government argued on the man's behalf,
 however, the Federal Court of Australia last July ruled mostly against
 Sony.

 Mr. von Lohmann said that Microsoft had not been particularly
 aggressive in combating Xbox hackers but that Sony had actively fought
 them. A Sony spokeswoman did not respond this week to requests for
 comment about the company's approach to hackers.

 For its part, Microsoft, through its public relations agency,
 indicated that it believed Xbox hackers were a relatively small band.
 "Aside from a set of hobbyists," it said, "the vast majority of Xbox
 owners are not focused on this niche."

 But those who are appear quite focused indeed. By e-mail, Mr. Steil,
 the German leader of the Xbox Linux project, declared: "In very simple
 words: The Xbox is cheaper than a PC. The Xbox is a lot smaller than a
 PC. The Xbox looks better (next to a TV set). The Xbox is more silent.
 Therefore it's an ideal Linux computer in the living room."

 That was probably not the vision Mr. Gates had in mind.

 _______________________________________________


 ------------------------
 http://www.anti-dmca.org
 ------------------------

 DMCA_Discuss mailing list
 DMCA_Discuss@lists.microshaft.org
 http://lists.microshaft.org/mailman/listinfo/dmca_discuss



More information about the linux-elitists mailing list