Free software licensing myths (was Re: [linux-elitists] The breadth of SCO's claims)
Karsten M. Self
Fri Jul 4 16:32:44 PDT 2003
on Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:57:42PM -0700, Rick Moen (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> Quoting Aaron Sherman (email@example.com):
> > I'm planning on writing an extensive essay on Open Source licensing
> > for people who are trying to decide how to license their software....
> Please don't. I mean that sincerely.
Seconded and raised: I'll actively campaign exposure of any such
"resource" as grossly misleading, if it reflects in any way your recent
expositions on free software licensing.
> Maybe Karsten has time and patience for revisiting this matter with you,
> but I don't.
As I've made abundently clear in off-list discussions, which I have zero
interest in continuing with Mr. Sherman, Rick's estimation of my
capacities are flatteringly exaggerated.
To the extent necessary to disabuse anyone of the falseness of claims
raised, I may debunk issues. The aforementioned shortage of time and
patience will likely reduce this to the simple statement: Aaron Sherman
is unqualified to speak on free software licensing issues.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Ceterum censeo, Caldera delenda est.
SCO vs IBM Linux lawsuit info: http://sco.iwethey.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030705/3fe8ba9a/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists