[linux-elitists] Re: H1-B
Tue Feb 18 01:08:11 PST 2003
>>>>> "KMS" == Karsten M Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
KMS> Whether it surprises you or not, that's actually pretty close
KMS> to my argument. Compete. But on equal terms.
How will this be possible? I'm asking mostly out of ignorance.
Especially the 'equal terms' bit. International competition usually
has a large element of inequality even for pure labor. Legal/tax
overhead is different, standards of living are different etc. etc.
This is different from the differences in educational systems,
culture / work ethic etc. but might actually be almost as significant
a factor (try tracking debian in a country where even 24h dial up access
costs $100-200 a month for example).
KMS> And clean up
KMS> after the mess if you're stuck with a bunch of bodies, don't
KMS> just ship 'em back where they came from.
I think the "open up the borders, let 'em compete" approach might have
been at least tenable had the US had a more liberitarian sort of
employment/taxation/SS system. Barring that, the moment someone steps
on a payroll, several issues arise that necessitate breaking the
equality aim. Taking responsibility for people who come over and
find themselves in non-viable conditions creates more issues. They
migh not be insurmountable, but I just don't see how one would deal
with them even in the abstract and I certainly don't see how these
solutions could be implemented through a democracy. Again, this is my
ignorance rather than convictions.
If A1='open up the borders', B1='they knew the rules
when they came over', A2=we'll regulate who comes in and why"
B2="we'll take care of them when the economy goes south." the
combination that seems toughest to arrange is A1B2. (A2B1 is closest
to the present system). Am I missing anything major here?
More information about the linux-elitists