[linux-elitists] We've seen SCO's evidence
Fri Aug 22 12:35:27 PDT 2003
begin Jonathan Corbet quotation of Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 08:04:20AM -0600:
> They really *don't* have massive piles of code that they will even try to
> claim were directly copied.
I wouldn't rule that out just yet. Why? Because they're going
out on a limb and reinterpreting (OK, basically repudiating) the
"I do not dispute that this letter was distributed and that Caldera
at the time allowed 16-bit, non-UNIX System V code to be contributed
to Linux for non-commercial use." -- Blake Stowell
If I had to guess, I'd say that means they have something else
that's covered by the Broderick letter, and they plan to use it.
Don Marti Reform copyright law -- return abandoned works
http://zgp.org/~dmarti to the public domain after 50 years:
More information about the linux-elitists