[linux-elitists] SCO claims the GPL is invalid...?

Karsten M. Self kmself@ix.netcom.com
Fri Aug 15 14:06:45 PDT 2003

on Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 01:13:40PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet (corbet-elite@lwn.net) wrote:
> > Jon, since this twinkie lawyer at Boies Schiller and Flexner actually 
> > _did_ (if you believe the Wall Street Journal) raise this sort of
> > kindergarten debating point for the credulous[1] -- an all-time low for
> > the plaintiff so far
> FWIW, I've got a message into the Florida office of Boies et al asking if I
> can have a little conversation with Mr. Heise.  I've told them I want to be
> able to report accurately on what he is really saying...  

Cool.  I was thinking of doing this myself.  In my copious discretionary
time.  Wait a minute....


Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
   I forgot my mantra.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20030815/8e1fcf84/attachment.pgp 

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list