[linux-elitists] ObSCOcontrib - Linux 2.4 scheduler
Mon Aug 11 06:23:02 PDT 2003
[Obvious OldSCO/Caldera/SCO Group contribution]
On Tue, 2003-08-12 at 00:56, Geoff Lane wrote:
> The Inquirer reports that a Caldera employee was very active in kernel
> and filesystem development _with_ Calderas approval
Both Caldera and old SCO employees were heavily involved in the
development of Linux as a enterprise scale platform. ( As if you haven't
read about the Trillian Project which ported Linux to Intel's IA-64
Dr. Stefan Hildemann claims to have had a chance to see SCO's code show
without having to sign the NDA; he has posted his impressions (in
Thanks to Robert Taylor this English translation of the posting
... The crunch, however, is a function of the scheduler, which is,
over a length of about 60 lines, indeed identical except for slight
differences. In this section, there is also a whole lot of
Well, one of the core SCO developer responsible for the development of
the SCO Groups current Unix Intel port, also contributed to the Linux
kernel. Compare this post of Jun's including the comments
To this actual part of the Linux 2.4 kernel
and consider the comment of Dr.Stefan Hildemann.
This raises more interesting questions. Since the SMP scheduler in
question was specifically written directly for Linux kernel, and both
Caldera/SCO employees only added patches, does it not seem more likely
that if there is common source and comment then it is likely that the
source in question was copied from Linux to The SCO Groups own Unix?
> Remember, Caldera was one of the major Linux distributions for a while and
> once were so well thought of as to be mentioned in the same sentence as
> companies such as Redhat.
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:22:37AM +1200, David Mohring wrote:
> > And Now The SCO Group have stated it would begin sending out invoices to
> > organizations using Linux as a step toward enforcing SCO's claim that
> > UnixWare System V code is used in Linux. "Invoices will be dispatched in
> > the "next weeks or months" a company spokesperson confirmed."
> > http://www.cbronline.com/latestnews/6b61a1cf114f8aa480256d7f0018bb99
> Great idea, issuing a false invoice is fraud.
Yes, the difference is that the Fair Trade Act makes it a Federal case,
very hard for the SCO Group executives themselves to dodge.
More information about the linux-elitists