Sig Delimiters (was: Re: [linux-elitists] Boies Faces Ethics Charges)

Seth David Schoen schoen@loyalty.org
Fri Aug 1 14:07:05 PDT 2003


Nick Moffitt writes:

> It's got some great stuff in there:
> > NOTE: Just as the (Latin-derived) prefix "Re:" that is commonly used
> > to indicate human-generated responses is sometimes translated to
> > other languages by mail readers, or otherwise interpreted by mail
> > readers as indication that the message is a reply, so the (Greek)
> > prefix "Auto:" may also be translated or used as a generic
> > indication that the message is an automatic response.  However the
> > "Auto:" indication is intended only as an aid to humans in
> > processing the message.  The validity of "Auto:" SHOULD NOT be
> > assumed by mail processing software.
> 
> Hooray for etymological notes in RFCs!

I think only Karsten Self SHOULD be allowed to use "Auto:".

-- 
Seth David Schoen <schoen@loyalty.org> | Very frankly, I am opposed to people
     http://www.loyalty.org/~schoen/   | being programmed by others.
     http://vitanuova.loyalty.org/     |     -- Fred Rogers (1928-2003),
                                       |        464 U.S. 417, 445 (1984)



More information about the linux-elitists mailing list