[linux-elitists] Fwd: Bitkeeper outragem, old and new
Tue Oct 15 06:34:33 PDT 2002
>>>>> "GK" == Greg KH <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
GK> Merges with an external source are wonderful.
By "external source", do you mean a tarball? Or another BitKeeper
GK> Also, changesets are very nice (yes, other VCS have them)
GK> along with the ability to do checkins in a distributed manner
GK> (don't have to be connected to a server), and support for file
GK> changes (rm, cp, mv), make it very nice.
GK> Specific for kernel development, it makes it _very_ easy to
GK> send changes to Linus.
It's weird -- this all sounds like stuff that the "next generation"
Free version control systems, like arch, katie, and subversion, do now
or intend to do.
But, hey, y'know,
Mr. Bad <email@example.com> | Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/
Work like you're gonna get fired, dance like Hunter S. Thompson.
More information about the linux-elitists