[linux-elitists] Re: Bind 8 bug experience (fwd)
Tue Nov 19 13:45:01 PST 2002
On Sun Nov 17, 2002 at 07:50:33PM +0000, Peter Whysall wrote:
> As noted before, djbdns is just dandy (obvious strangitude
> notwithstanding), right up to the point where the boss says, "Now make
> it serve DNS for our Windows 2000 network."
What difference does that make? DNS is DNS. I'm using dnscache to
serve a workstation pool of about 20 Windows 2000 machines, and tinydns
to serve authoritative data for our domains, and Windows machines don't
have any trouble resolving anything.
More information about the linux-elitists