Double Irony! (was Re: [linux-elitists] ruben's stupid filter)
Karsten M. Self
Sun Mar 24 17:23:45 PST 2002
on Sun, Mar 24, 2002, Jeremy Zawodny (Jeremy@Zawodny.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 24, 2002 at 04:39:47PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > - Tools like spamassassin are pretty damned slick. For personal
> > systems, it handles the load admirably. Moving this to the mail
> > gateway raises performance issues -- I'm seeing about 0.4 seconds
> > per validated mail, restricting any one server to a total possible
> > peak of about 200,000 mails a day. Sufficient for many, but not
> > all, purposes.
> By making use of the spamc/spamd client/server pair,
That *is* spamc/spamd. Running spamassassin standalone is ~4
> you can scale that up quite a ways. A large ISP could have multiple
> spamd machines with fast CPUs that do nothing but handling request to
> scan messages from the spamc machines.
That's a possibility, but we have limited rackspace, and have to
allocate it carefully. Spamd doesn't serialize currently, might have
significant improvements if it did.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Keep software free. Oppose the CBDTPA. Kill S.2048 dead.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20020324/a0d534fc/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists