[linux-elitists] OSI and non-OSD tools
Wed Mar 20 10:16:27 PST 2002
* Rick Moen (email@example.com) wrote :
> [snip OSI Board]
> Quoting Aaron T Porter (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > While reading mail to the license-discuss list recently, I noticed
> > that the list is running on EZMLM and Qmail, neither of which meets
> > the OSD. While I understand that the software selection may well be an
> > unintentional result of opensource.org's hosting on hyperreal, it
> > seems an odd decision for a group "dedicated to managing and promoting
> > the Open Source Definition for the good of the community".
> > Are there any plans at this time to migrate to an OSD compliant MTA
> > and/or list manager?
> 1. Better you than me, in raising this matter.
> 2. license-discuss runs on qmail/ezmlm because Russ Nelson won't budge.
> And he's been known to fly off the handle if you even _tease_ him
> about OSI relying on his favourite proprietary software.
> Russ told me with no obvious humourous intent that my
> http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#djb is "libelous" towards
> qmail/djbdns/etc. He had no reply when I asked what novel legal
> theory supports litigation by a piece of software.
> Good luck. It's a real issue, but I gave up on that one a year or two
It's also the same issue that debian currently has, but for a slightly more
pragmatic reason (it's hassle to remove qmail, and the sysadmin team don't
yet have time). Anyhow, lists.debian.org runs smartlist on qmail.
Hopefully, this'll be rectified pretty soon.
More information about the linux-elitists