[linux-elitists] Fwd: PGP signature attachments!
Karsten M. Self
Fri Sep 7 19:25:24 PDT 2001
on Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:00:35AM +0100, Sean Neakums (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> begin Karsten M Self quotation:
> > on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:28:05PM +0100, Sean Neakums (email@example.com) wrote:
> >> As I said:
> >> > There is plenty in there that states why *you* think you should be
> >> > allowed to sign with PGP/MIME but there is nothing to say why other
> >> > people should do likewise.
> >> Does this or does this not indicate that I grasped the thrust of your
> >> rant?
> > It doesn't.
> Well, you're wrong. Enjoy.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20010907/2782b8e9/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists