[linux-elitists] Fwd: PGP signature attachments!
Karsten M. Self
Fri Sep 7 17:52:08 PDT 2001
on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 10:28:05PM +0100, Sean Neakums (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> begin Karsten M Self quotation:
> > on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:45:58PM +0100, Sean Neakums (email@example.com) wrote:
> >> begin Karsten M Self quotation:
> > My rant isn't aimed at convincing people to *sign* their messages,
> > it's to convince them to get a mailer that *supports* RFC 2015
> > signed messages:
> Well, duh.
> As I said:
> > There is plenty in there that states why *you* think you should be
> > allowed to sign with PGP/MIME but there is nothing to say why other
> > people should do likewise.
> Does this or does this not indicate that I grasped the thrust of your
> Please point out where I claimed that people should not have MUAs that
> understand RFC2015. Please point out where I said that your rant
> addresses what people should send and not what they should accept.
If you're arguing over the fact that we're in agreement, then we're in
violent agreement, and there is no argument.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20010907/aeed54cb/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists