[linux-elitists] Fwd: PGP signature attachments!
Karsten M. Self
Fri Sep 7 12:22:06 PDT 2001
on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:00:11PM +0100, Sean Neakums (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> begin Karsten M Self quotation:
> > on Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 07:25:46PM +0100, Sean Neakums (email@example.com) wrote:
> >> A good user agent will hide plaintext PGP gubbins in exactly the
> >> same way as it hides MIME gubbins. Your faulty software is no
> >> concern of mine.
> > A good mailer will support RFC 2015. Your faulty software is no
> > concern of mine.
> Are you trying to make some kind of point here, or just reversing my
> statements to witless effect?
RFC 2015 is a defined, if draft, standard. It works, it provides
useful functionality, it has minimal side effects (as opposed, say, to
the automated parsing of email for inline elements such as is used in
Microsoft products which will effectively truncate mail starting at
begin some text (note the two blanks following 'begin').
Parsing of inline content is changing the interpretation of plain text
messages. Why do this when there is a perfectly good, open, free
standard based on good, open, free MIME encoding, which operates
Your "a good user agent" is a specious as mine. A good user agent
follows standards and doesn't impose unexpected behavior based on
Reversing arguments, yes. Witless effects, I fear we differ.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20010907/885314a3/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists