[linux-elitists] Re: pho: Tonight on Disney
Karsten M. Self
Tue Oct 23 19:23:54 PDT 2001
on Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 07:43:12AM -0400, Aaron Sherman (email@example.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 05:18:44PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> The huge sucking sound you hear is a business model vacuum! Someone
> needs to firgure out how to:
> a. Get good artists paid for their work
> b. Do it without a 99% cut for a middle-man
> c. Let me choose what I want to listen to.
I'm playing with an idea here that I've been kicking around for a few
months, I've posted bits to Pho, there's an FSB response I've been
crufting for the past week or so.
Essentially, some sort of "content syndicate", which does a reasonable
and fair, but not exact and precise, job of allocating credit for
content. Some back-of-the-envelope calculations based on 1 trillion
works downloaded per month, a par value of one cent per download,
minimum criterion of capturing all traffic sufficient to generate $1000
in annual income (with a 50% chance of success at this level), and
sampling on a weekly basis (~52 samples/yr), works out to sampling some
tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of downloads would be
That is, sampling 0.01% of traffic (with a representative sample) is
sufficient to capture usage sufficiently to allocate revenues to anyone
due more than $1000 per year. This is a level that's low enough to work
even on a very broadly distributed filesharing system, so long as
traffic patterns across nodes are reasonably similar.
This system only addresses one part of the question: whether or not
it's possible to get a reasonable assessment of use through monitoring.
The unit rate (payment per download) and actual means for connecting
artists to fans is still somewhat open. For the latter I'm leaning
toward a system similar to, say, premium cable, where you can subscribe
for various classes of service. What I'd like to see is a system that's
open on both sides though -- there's no restriction as to which artists
can participate, or on which ISPs (or other entity representing end
users) can subscribe. AOL is an example of routing premium content, but
following a closed model.
> When I share a file on Gnutella, Napster, Freenet, FTP or the Web,
> whether privately or publicly, I'm throwing water on a business model
> that big media wants to see happen. I say too bad. We're not in the
> business of defending bad business models. My money is on the guy who
> figures out how to build what MP3.com should have been.
> I'm not saying we should trade Brittany Spears singles. I'm saying we
> should have a segment of the music industry that takes advantage of
> file sharing and promotes it! I'm saying that there is a fortune to be
> made in moderating the interaction between the artist and the
> file-sharee. Create a Web site that moderates and reviews files that
> are then shared via Gnutella or Freenet (and where those files are
> contributed by the artists) and I will bet that the RIAA will be a
> thing of the past in 20 years.
I'm not sure about a fortune, but I'd settle for a mildly dishonsest
> "Information wants to be free" is a statement of the first law of
> information thermodynamics. Like all natural laws, there's money to be
> made in harnessing it for the public good....
You understand the meaning of that phrase. It's not an economic dictum,
it's a physical tendency. And, IMO, it's deriveable from the 3rd law.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20011023/c3c668b4/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists