[linux-elitists] Science Journals Suck (fwd)
Wed Jul 4 06:09:05 PDT 2001
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
> EL's forwarded messages illustrates just one aspect of the reasons
> why the transition will be slow. There's a communication gap between
> people who are knowledgeable in the infrastructure technology and have
> been successfully using the web as it's inventor had intended, and the
> "masses" regardless of how otherwise well educated the masses are.
Tell me about it. I've been waving my tongue for years, before realizing
that the target audience simply had no clue.
But it's worse: current strategies work both for the publishing mafia and
the established science. They will protect their fishing grounds
jealously, and furthermore will attempt to discipline "traitors" (young
scientists not yet part of the machine, and hence having nothing to lose
and everything to win) from their midst.
It will take a while, meanwhile Elsevier et al. will be cashing in.
I shouldn't be actually railing against this, because Springer makes me be
able to pay my bills.
> Speeding up the process will take some honest marketing probably.
> Killer features (like the Amazon-style inference engine coupled to a
> variant of the advogato trust/credibility metric) that require massive
> amounts of data and thus semi-open access might speed this up, however.
> Anyway, we know breaking into colourful language won't help. Maybe a
No, the target audience is a remarkably concervative bunch.
> better way to communicate the goings on in this list to others is a
> short and non-offensive excerpt and a pointer to the thread.
-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a>
ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204
57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3
More information about the linux-elitists