[linux-elitists] California Copyleft Research Initiative of 2001
Sun Jul 1 21:33:46 PDT 2001
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Heather wrote:
> > But is this a bad thing? Scientific publishers should not be able to
> > derive profits (in an economic sense of the word) from the activity of
> > distribution, which itself could be done for a fraction of the cost
> > via the network. Their profits should come from their value added,
> Wrong tack. They're perfectly welcome to make money at presenting
> the material in The Nicest Way, the most Formal Journals, etc
> ad-lilliputia. Their value add is the formality and, in all
> likelihood, a certain amount of educated discussion of the results.
I apologize if I wasn't clear, but this is certainly part of the
"value-add" for which I was saying they're entitled to economic profit.
So I meant to be agreeing with what you say here.
> But the point is to protect and foster the research which the paper
> describes, so, no, they can't make it so that only the 4 labs around the
> country who can afford the Hoi Polloi Royal Journal can benefit from
> publicly funded efforts.
I must confess to more than a little through-the-hat speaking on my
part, as I'm not intimately familiar with the world of formal
scientific journals and such like. But isn't that precisely what they
tend to do now?
Ryan Waldron ||| http://www.erebor.com ||| firstname.lastname@example.org
"The web goes ever, ever on, down from the site where it began..."
More information about the linux-elitists