[linux-elitists] BurnAllRedHat?

Rick Moen rick@linuxmafia.com
Thu Dec 13 11:39:52 PST 2001

begin Derek Vadala quotation:

> In Rick's example that's clear. But I think the point they're trying to
> make is that you can't use their mark if your product is derived from
> theirs.

They can _claim_ that.  Here's some prototype ad copy:

   Uncle Pete's Linux Distribution

   We took all the packages in Red Hat Software(R)'s Red Hat Linux(R)
   v. 7.2 as our point of departure, replaced wu-ftpd with vs-ftpd,
   sendmail with exim, yanked out Netscape Navigator/Communicator as
   superfluous in this day and age, replaced pico with nano and an
   appropriate symlink, and replaced pine with a script that runs mutt
   with Pine.rc to emulate the pine keybindings.  All yours for $nn.nn
   with a nice, friendly copy of _Running Linux_ 3rd edition -- and it's
   better _and_ cheaper than those other guys.  Oh, and _our_ default
   kernel doesn't choke on AIC7896 chipsets, either.

>From my Not-A-Lawyer perspective, it looks to me that Red Hat Software,
Inc. can't enjoin that, except by invoking the "We're bigger than you" 

"Is it not the beauty of an asynchronous form of discussion that one can go and 
make cups of tea, floss the cat, fluff the geraniums, open the kitchen window 
and scream out it with operatic force, volume, and decorum, and then return to 
the vexed glowing letters calmer of mind and soul?" -- The Cube, forum3000.org

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list