[linux-elitists] BurnAllRedHat?

Steve Beattie steve@wirex.net
Wed Dec 12 10:49:24 PST 2001

On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:14:59AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 05:51:17PM -0000, Rusty Foster wrote:
> > 
> > I would agree with this. It's unclear to me how far RedHat wants to
> > take this, though. While definitely not a GPL violation, it strikes me
> > as somewhat anti-community. If they're OK with "based on redhat linux"
> > though, I'd have no problem with it.
> Red Hat does spell out, in many detailed words, exactly what is ok to do
> about copying their cds.  They even drill down to the size of the font
> that you have to say "based on Red Hat Linux" on the cd :)
> Unfortunately I can't find the document anymore on their site, but I do
> remember reading it when I was working on the Immunix distro (which is
> based on Red Hat.)  From what I remember, I thought it was quite fair,
> and seemed to be so that people would not buy copied cds and try to
> claim that Red Hat owed them support in any way.
> Anyone have a pointer to that page?  Steve?

It used to exist at:


but that page is now 404-compliant. Fortunately, web.archive.org has
archives of it, the latest is at:


(Bah, web.archive.org rocks, except for their stupid reliance on

Steve Beattie                               Don't trust programmers? 
<steve@wirex.net>                         Complete StackGuard distro at
http://NxNW.org/~steve/                            immunix.org
          "Fight for freedom by giving up civil liberties!"
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20011212/cf14c511/attachment.pgp 

More information about the linux-elitists mailing list