[linux-elitists] GPG luser rant
Karsten M. Self
Thu Apr 12 19:30:39 PDT 2001
on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 07:16:26PM -0700, Mr. Bad (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> >>>>> "KMS" == Karsten M Self <email@example.com> writes:
> KMS> This is meant as a group resource. I'd like for this to be
> KMS> something people can (and want to) point at. I might even
> KMS> tone down the language, if someone can come up with any
> KMS> fucking convincing arguments for doing gutless shit like
> KMS> that.
> Uh, is there a good reason this rant isn't signed?
It is, as a component of my signed email to the list.
It isn't as a separate document -- it's currently in draft form, and the
message can be validate in whole.
...or am I missing something?
Yes, signing the finished work would be a nice touch.
Karsten M. Self <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20010412/1eaca4c3/attachment.pgp
More information about the linux-elitists