[linux-elitists] What is the Elite MTA?
Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO
Sun Apr 1 05:06:29 PDT 2001
Free Software allows others to CHANGE the software
THis is EXACTLY the oposite of what cults allow.
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 07:37:42PM -0500, Brooklyn Linux Solutions CEO wrote:
> > The pararells because DJB advocates and cult behavior really deserves
> > acute study. Cults put forth a doctrin which can not be changed and
> > is considered superior to any other doctrine. It's minions
> > decend on unsuspecting targets baraging them with "fact" and
> > beligerantly insisting on presenting all their facts in detail.
> > Free Software is just the opossite, and this is why it succeeds.
> > Free Software is patient. No one has to beat anyone else over the
> > head with technical details because - it's open license forces
> > compermise between different opinions and fosters co-operation.
> How is "Free Software" not a cult, with doctrines, bias, ignorance, and
> minions? Perhaps you would understand my question better if you considered
> "Free Software" to be a meta-cult.
> What you yourself are doing is merely putting rehashing arguements put forward
> by others.
> It's fairly obvious that DJB's licences are fairly odd (using the DFSG as a
> basis), but they suit his purposes. His fervent followers are merely people
> who really like the programs and their features, and have decided to adhere to
> his licences. It doesn't make them far out wacky cultists.
> If it does, then we're all far out wacky cultists of one sort or another.
> > The technology is completely unimportant if it's licensing
> > is designed to enslave the user.
> Throw away that computer. Become illiterate. Burn all your electrical wiring.
> Slaves? What slaves?
> Edward C. Lang <email@example.com> woot on irc.openprojects.net
> Encrypted mail prefered. KeyID: 1024D/61A332F6
[application/pgp-signature is not supported, skipping...]
More information about the linux-elitists