[linux-elitists] Hm, editor wars
Tue Jun 27 11:27:38 PDT 2000
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 11:23:30AM -0700, Don Marti wrote:
> begin Marc MERLIN quotation of Tue, Jun 27, 02000 at 10:47:31AM -0700:
> > So what? Intel will patch registers to be 36 bits and last a bit longer...
> > (Oh yeah, they'll also declare than from now on, an int is really 36 bits)
> A bit longer? Thank you for taking the long view and not letting the
> corporate culture force you into the quarter-by-quarter rush to local
> maxima that leads to long-term extinction. Speaking of the long view,
Did I say I agreed? Of course going to 36 bits is completely stupid, if
you're going to step up, step up to 64 bits.
However, as you know, intel has gone to 36 bit addressing to break the 4G
line, instead of going to 64 bit addressing...
> No, that's good. We want people never to make assumptions about the
> size of an int (or any data type for that matter.) It only makes it
> harder to port software. http://www.advogato.org/article/97.html
> is good, I think.
True, but I don't want to be the guy to patch all that OSS software out
Microsoft is to software what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ (friendly to non IE browsers)
Finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP key and other contact information
More information about the linux-elitists