[linux-elitists] Hm, editor wars
Tue Jun 27 07:56:32 PDT 2000
> begin Paul J Collins quotation:
> > Hmm... the last time I saw a bus error was when Netscape loaded a
> > bogus plugin, but of course it was almost certainly pure
> > coincidence; I was due a nice solid crash anyway.
> There are very few conditions that will cause a bus error on
> i386 srchitecture. i386 isn't particularly alignment-picky, which is
> the typical reason that bus errors occur on most architectures.
> Bus errors are particularly Unixy because Unix has run mainly
> on very fussy RISC chips in the past ten years or so.
In this case it's I/O bus, not memory bus; the input events stack is
particularly unhappy with the combo of my abuse of Virtual Consoles and
the X console vis-a-vis netscape's slipperiness regarding which app has
> i386 doesn't even have an "executable" attribute for memory
> pages, which is why we all can't have non-executable stacks the way
> that suns and macs can.
Ahh, but we can, there is at least one commercial and at least one non
commercial implementation I know of for us. Admitted, our cheapo hardware
isn't able to help out. But we needn't let that stop us.
Hit google with keyword "Solar Designer" - you'll find it in no time. Jim's
been running with his patches in for a while.
> I'm an eager beneficiary counting the days until the i386's
Wait for time_t to wrap...
* Heather * Established technology tends to persist in the face of new
technology. -- G. Blaauw, one of the designers of System 360
More information about the linux-elitists