[linux-elitists] compatability between Artistic Licence and GPL

kmself@ix.netcom.com kmself@ix.netcom.com
Thu Aug 10 15:42:17 PDT 2000


On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 12:56:13PM -0700, Ben Woodard wrote:
> Does anyone know about any problems incorporating calls into GPL'd
> (not LGPL'd) libraries into code that has an artistic licence?

Artistic allows relicensing.

For the purposes of the incorporated libraries LGPL shouldn't be an
issue (so long as you're referencing, not changing, the library), GPL
would require the combined work be available under the terms of the GPL.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>     http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.                    http://www.opensales.org
  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?   Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/    K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://allium.zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/attachments/20000810/9c2c5bcc/attachment.pgp 


More information about the linux-elitists mailing list